> I took me a couple of weeks to figure out the person do did that was moving the CG of the framed print closer to the wall which made hit hang nearly flat on t

> I took me a couple of weeks to figure out the person do did that was moving the CG of the framed print closer to the wall which made hit hang nearly flat on the wall. As it was at the bottom of the frame, it also moved the CG lower, which also helps to reduce the tilt, even if the CG remains a little bit to the front. > When reading the referenced article I realized it also allowed for an arbitrarily tightly stretched cross wire because the steel plate would bear all of the stress, not the art. I don't really get this, if the plate was at the bottom. I assume the stretched wire would be attached somewhere at the top half, so the rest of the frame would need to bear at least some of the stress.