3 ms·
I don’t understand this argument. Are you saying the internet should be organised in a way that benefits the US, even if it is confusing for people in other cou
by vladharbuz 3y ago
I don’t understand this argument. Are you saying the internet should be organised in a way that benefits the US, even if it is confusing for people in other countries? By your reasoning, it would make sense for .com to be US-exclusive because the US had a primary role in inventing the internet. Let’s pause to ask ourselves “what is an actually good system?” instead of “how can we justify US privilege?”.
- pc86 3y agoI'm not saying it's right or wrong, I'm just saying that's what led to where we are today.
- vladharbuz 3y agoThat’s fair, sorry, I read too much into what you were saying!
- TheCoelacanth 3y agoThe question isn't really "is this a good system", it's "is this a bad enough system that it's worth spending billions of dollars to change".