5 ms·
> The extensions pack was always under a proprietary license. Yes, while I'm not sure if the actual terms of the license changed, enforcement changed very much
by omnibrain 3y ago
> The extensions pack was always under a proprietary license.
Yes, while I'm not sure if the actual terms of the license changed, enforcement changed very much.
With SUN ist was "Of course, you can personally install it on your work computer and use it for work. Only if you deploy it to your fleet of computers please pay us."
https://web.archive.org/web/20100204053823/https://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Licensing_FAQ https://web.archive.org/web/20100204053823/https://www.virtu...
- nvm0n1 3y agoMaybe that approach to licensing is why Sun ran out of money and had to sell itself?
- thrawaway3292 3y agoI doubt VirtualBox was even a line item on Sun's financials, so I really doubt that had anything to do with their failure.
- nvm0n1 3y agoWhat I meant is, a lackadaisical approach to billing and asking for money was common at Sun for everything software related, same thing for Java which was definitely a line item.
- dredmorbius 3y agoHardware was Sun's revenue model. Cost of revenue for penny-ante fluff would have been orders of magnitude greater than actual revenue. Goodwill and other benefits substantively greater. Blaming Sun's demise on Virtualbox largess is ludicrous on its face.
- jzb 3y agoSun has its lunch eaten by Linux and commodity hardware. Selling proprietary UNIX and super expensive hardware was a great business until Linux and (comparatively) cheap Intel boxes were good enough for more and more customers.