> I think the industry has rightly come to the conclusion that, all else being equal, and even sometimes when they are not, a more complex language is a worse l

> I think the industry has rightly come to the conclusion that, all else being equal, and even sometimes when they are not, a more complex language is a worse language. That was a theory behind golang, and the observed result is that you're better off having a little bit more language constructs that may be misused, than having essential complexity in your problem space that you can't easily describe in your solution space, for lack of tools.