4 ms·

Many human experiences are better understood by means that are not scientific. Life is full of aesthetic, moral, spiritual, and even unanswerable questions. Sci

Many human experiences are better understood by means that are not scientific. Life is full of aesthetic, moral, spiritual, and even unanswerable questions. Science is incredible and beautiful and profound - but it's not everything. I can't remember what TV show I heard this on, but I like it; "the true sweetness of wine is... but one flavor." (ETA: The show was Marco Polo.)

YurgenJurgensen 3y ago
How do you know that you're actually "understanding" these experiences and not just making up whatever confirms your preconceptions?
- pyinstallwoes 3y ago
  How do you know you aren't the person in the Chinese Room? [^1] 1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_room https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_room
- ehnto 3y ago
  I guess it wouldn't matter, a lot of the human experience is dogmatic. It's not necessarily wrong to experience life through minor misunderstandings, especially ones that make life more bearable. I am a little jealous of people who believe they go to heaven for one example. The experience of their entire life may be enriched by that, whereas I gain nothing by not believing in it.
- maxbond 3y ago
  I don't mean to be factitious, but I'm gunnuh answer your question with a question. How do you know someone loves you? Because everyone I've ever met has been convinced certain people love them or don't, it's tremendously meaningful to their lives, and none of them used science to do it.
yakshaving_jgt 3y ago
This is essentially the kremlin propaganda defence. “It’s all so complicated! Nobody could really know the truth!” Come on.
- maxbond 3y ago
  If I were claiming that something which was knowable as a fact, wasn't, then sure. If I'm claiming that like, tarot helped me develop a spiritual relationship with the world (this isn't the case for me personally), then no, that isn't propaganda. I sure you can see a substantive difference in these claims.

YurgenJurgensen 3y ago

How do you know that you're actually "understanding" these experiences and not just making up whatever confirms your preconceptions?

pyinstallwoes 3y ago
How do you know you aren't the person in the Chinese Room? [^1] 1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_room https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_room
ehnto 3y ago
I guess it wouldn't matter, a lot of the human experience is dogmatic. It's not necessarily wrong to experience life through minor misunderstandings, especially ones that make life more bearable. I am a little jealous of people who believe they go to heaven for one example. The experience of their entire life may be enriched by that, whereas I gain nothing by not believing in it.
maxbond 3y ago
I don't mean to be factitious, but I'm gunnuh answer your question with a question. How do you know someone loves you? Because everyone I've ever met has been convinced certain people love them or don't, it's tremendously meaningful to their lives, and none of them used science to do it.

yakshaving_jgt 3y ago

This is essentially the kremlin propaganda defence. “It’s all so complicated! Nobody could really know the truth!” Come on.

maxbond 3y ago
If I were claiming that something which was knowable as a fact, wasn't, then sure. If I'm claiming that like, tarot helped me develop a spiritual relationship with the world (this isn't the case for me personally), then no, that isn't propaganda. I sure you can see a substantive difference in these claims.