This doesn't really make any logical sense if you think about it. The reason jobs exist is not because the person hiring can't do them, but because they have ot

This doesn't really make any logical sense if you think about it. The reason jobs exist is not because the person hiring can't do them, but because they have other things they'd rather focus their time and energy on. You don't hire a janitor because you can't clean the floors, toilets, and other areas - but because you have different priorities for your own time. To consider this more intuitively, take a field you probably less skilled in - art. There are some really quite amazing "AI" based generative systems for art, far more domain competent than e.g. ChatGPT is at coding. Now imagine you're setting out to make a video game. Do you suddenly feel like taking on the entire art load would be a good way to spend your time and energy, let alone if we compare that to what an artist using the same tools would accomplish in the same time? If anything "AI" will probably just be a skill multiplier.