4 ms·

I find the idea itself stupid and distasteful. I've never understood the blind unsubstantiated hate for the rich. Surely, a lot of them has done things many cou

I find the idea itself stupid and distasteful. I've never understood the blind unsubstantiated hate for the rich. Surely, a lot of them has done things many could find objectionable, but this seems more like institutionalized prejudice than anything else.

irdc 3y ago
What part is institutionalised?
- ldehaan 3y ago
  [dead]
- Dalewyn 3y ago
  If you're asked to hate someone, or worse hate an opaque group of someones, for the grave crime of just having lots of money, you're being sold a bridge.
  - irdc 3y ago
    That doesn’t answer my question. It sounds like you’re using “institutionalised” as a scare word.
    - Dalewyn 3y ago
      The institution of using the spread of information (or "information" as it were) to incite conflict and unrest for ulterior motives is an institution known to man since the dawn of politics. The specific form adapts as the means of information spread changes over time, but the institution at its core remains the same.
      - irdc 3y ago
        That’s not what most people would see as “institutionalised prejudice” though.
      - troyvit 3y ago
        That doesn't seem to be the purpose of this plugin. In fact, if there is an institutionalized, blind hatred of the rich then this plugin would decrease the amount of hate in the world, since people would be seeing less of what they hate, wouldn't it? And does it harm the rich any? Can't see how it does.
  - freediverx 3y ago
    It’s not about “having” money, but what you did to acquire it and what you’re doing with it.
- bloody-crow 3y ago
  Maybe not the best choice of words on my part, but I used it as a prejudice that it widely accepted and propagated as morally non-dubious by mainstream culture.
  - irdc 3y ago
    A moral rejection of self-enrichment is a core cultural value in the West (and probably in other regions as well) going back to, at least, the Middle Ages. If you’re expecting to alter people’s core cultural values through posting on HN, you’re going to have a bad time.
freediverx 3y ago
Fuck the rich and their bootlicking admirers.

irdc 3y ago

What part is institutionalised?

ldehaan 3y ago
[dead]
Dalewyn 3y ago
If you're asked to hate someone, or worse hate an opaque group of someones, for the grave crime of just having lots of money, you're being sold a bridge.
- irdc 3y ago
  That doesn’t answer my question. It sounds like you’re using “institutionalised” as a scare word.
  - Dalewyn 3y ago
    The institution of using the spread of information (or "information" as it were) to incite conflict and unrest for ulterior motives is an institution known to man since the dawn of politics. The specific form adapts as the means of information spread changes over time, but the institution at its core remains the same.
    - irdc 3y ago
      That’s not what most people would see as “institutionalised prejudice” though.
    - troyvit 3y ago
      That doesn't seem to be the purpose of this plugin. In fact, if there is an institutionalized, blind hatred of the rich then this plugin would decrease the amount of hate in the world, since people would be seeing less of what they hate, wouldn't it? And does it harm the rich any? Can't see how it does.
- freediverx 3y ago
  It’s not about “having” money, but what you did to acquire it and what you’re doing with it.
bloody-crow 3y ago
Maybe not the best choice of words on my part, but I used it as a prejudice that it widely accepted and propagated as morally non-dubious by mainstream culture.
- irdc 3y ago
  A moral rejection of self-enrichment is a core cultural value in the West (and probably in other regions as well) going back to, at least, the Middle Ages. If you’re expecting to alter people’s core cultural values through posting on HN, you’re going to have a bad time.

freediverx 3y ago

Fuck the rich and their bootlicking admirers.