Fine point. I was trying to leave mining out of it. Anyway, an argument towards stopping future use and abuse of a broken system is not equivalent to an argume

Fine point. I was trying to leave mining out of it. Anyway, an argument towards stopping future use and abuse of a broken system is not equivalent to an argument to destroy existing structures. The former is corrective; the latter is revolutionary. Revolutions are stupid and useless because they always result in a new iteration of the existing problem.