Would YouTube need to report [1] (a news report about a police officer accidentally overdosing on fentanyl due to exposure on the job) because it is a fact or c

Would YouTube need to report [1] (a news report about a police officer accidentally overdosing on fentanyl due to exposure on the job) because it is a fact or circumstance regarding the unlawful distribution of a fentanyl? How many rap songs and lyrics would need to be reported just because they appear to contain lyrics about potential actual drug use? Would every "{celebrity_name} dies from drug overdose" news article and discussion on social media need to be reported? Should USPTO patent US3141823A[1] (a method for synthesising fentanyl) be reported? Perhaps that social media user who linked to this patent is involved in the unlawful manufacture of fentanyl? Should the National Institutes of Health published article "An Efficient, Optimized Synthesis of Fentanyl and Related Analogs"[3] be reported? Perhaps that social media user who linked to this article is involved in the unlawful manufacture of fentanyl? Given the proposed bill prevents notification of the preservation request for at least 5 days, is the platform meant to delete the offending content for terms of service violation, or leave the content in place so as to not alert the user(s)? If the platform can't delete the offending content, what happens if the content was uploaded alongside copyright infringing material, pornographic material, or other content that the platform would typically immediately remove? [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jd76HxqCPf0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jd76HxqCPf0 [2] https://patents.google.com/patent/US3141823A/en https://patents.google.com/patent/US3141823A/en [3] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4169472/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4169472/