> Really mostly nimbys. Greens have relented. Head in the Sandies is probably even more encompassing. From people that tink the solution is drilling for oil in

> Really mostly nimbys. Greens have relented. Head in the Sandies is probably even more encompassing. From people that tink the solution is drilling for oil in national parks to people thinking suing developers and separating their trash is all you need to do. They're stupid people. Neither should be influencing policy. Seems to me that the usual historical options aren't acceptable. Business as usual looks bad. The traditional solution, genocidal warfare seems like a really bad idea for someone living in an industrial civilization. We could degrowth. But the Khmer Rouge tried that in the 1970's and back to the rice fields didn't work very well for most people. So seems like technological mitigation is all we can hope for.