4 ms·
I’ve fed chatGPT the specs for some toy languages that it didn’t know and it generated code in them no problem but did a lot of filling in the blanks for what i
by dave84 3y ago
I’ve fed chatGPT the specs for some toy languages that it didn’t know and it generated code in them no problem but did a lot of filling in the blanks for what it thought would be in the standard libs.
Something more interesting to think about is what would a programming language designed FOR llms to use look like?
- datameta 3y agoWould that be good feedback then? To implement those features into the library because ChatGPT expecting to be able to use them may be akin to it expecting a human to likely use them. Or not really?
- dave84 3y agoIn most cases it made perfect sense. One joke language had no for loop by design, and just a while type loop and chatGPT invented a for loop, but when I told it to stick only to the spec it completed the problems without an issue. When web browsing was enabled it was able to learn these by itself.
- an_aparallel 3y agoEnglish, of course. really, really clear English.
- dave84 3y agoNo, then we’d need to write an English compiler, I’m talking about an output language.