3 ms·

I didn't want to put full context in the post as it could be distracting, but it's for http://random-character.com http://random-character.com There's a varied

by muzani 3y ago

I didn't want to put full context in the post as it could be distracting, but it's for http://random-character.com http://random-character.com There's a varied user base - some use it to help with writer's block, some chuck it into chatgpt to make some kind of game or story, some use it to practice art, and one of the earliest uses was some NPC generator. I do get questions in the suggestions form, which is weird because they often don't attach an email address to respond to those questions. There's likely no offline equivalent, it's likely a bunch of people who come in from Bing to talk about similar interests. I had a Discord but it didn't click, maybe because of the lack of critical mass - there's just too many discord servers and nobody wants to stay in one with only a single person. Also the other thing is I'm considering adding modding, and I'd like people to be able to share their mods, gauge interest, and get support. However, without a community, it makes little sense to allow mods.

brudgers 3y ago
Cool tool. It doesn’t change the basis of my comment. The intersection of people who use a tool and the people who want to type into little boxes on the internet with people who do X typically approximates the empty set because most people don’t want to type text into little boxes on the internet. People use hammers for tasks that use hammers not to be part of the-hammer-using-community. What the context changes for me is the additional comment that building another tool (maybe for the same audience maybe for a different one) is probably a better use of your time than building a community platform for a non-organic community. The tool works and that means people use it and move on. To a first approximation, it is finished…that actually happens sometimes. You’re at the point of diminishing returns. Or maybe negative if the community building effort distracts people from writing with popups and emails and pm’s. Anyway getting good at building useful tools is a good skill. Part of that is recognizing the natural scope of projects.

by muzani 3y ago

brudgers 3y ago

Cool tool. It doesn’t change the basis of my comment. The intersection of people who use a tool and the people who want to type into little boxes on the internet with people who do X typically approximates the empty set because most people don’t want to type text into little boxes on the internet. People use hammers for tasks that use hammers not to be part of the-hammer-using-community. What the context changes for me is the additional comment that building another tool (maybe for the same audience maybe for a different one) is probably a better use of your time than building a community platform for a non-organic community. The tool works and that means people use it and move on. To a first approximation, it is finished…that actually happens sometimes. You’re at the point of diminishing returns. Or maybe negative if the community building effort distracts people from writing with popups and emails and pm’s. Anyway getting good at building useful tools is a good skill. Part of that is recognizing the natural scope of projects.