6 ms·

The answer is if it isn’t notarized I didn’t sign it. Go away. And then I submit a copy of one the judge signed as evidence.

nkozyra 3y ago
That's a nice answer but I don't think that prevents you from spending money on arbitration or their getting a default judgement against you.
- pas 3y ago
  do they even have jurisdiction? have the speakers agreed to arbitration? otherwise it's just more spam. edit: ah, okay, so they signed a "license agreement", which is basically a scam. welp.
  - the_mitsuhiko 3y ago
    They likely put a binding arbitration clause into the initial contract for speaking.
    - johngladtj 3y ago
      Why would a contract that is in dispute change the jurisdiction? The point is that the contract is invalid, so it makes no sense that it would be valid for jurisdiction
      - the_mitsuhiko 3y ago
        I responded to this question: > have the speakers agreed to arbitration?
the_mitsuhiko 3y ago
Doesn’t work if they decide to go to arbitration.
cynicalsecurity 3y ago
You must be that lucky person who doesn't live in Poland. An electric administrative court in Poland doesn't even check if the provided evidence is correct in any way. They automatically assume the plaintiff is right, according to the official law. And if you don't object plaintiff's accusations, you lose. They try to contact you by mail, but if they can't, they don't care. It's your fault they couldn't deliver mail to you which looks just like any other scam. The scammer fakes the evidence, submits the case electronically, can request any amount of money and wins by default. Nice, isn't it? You've officially lost in this circus "court". Good luck proving anything to the real court now, as it would consume a lot of your money, time and mental sanity. In the meantime, the scammer is officially allowed to seize any of your money they decided you "owe" them. You would not expect something like this exist in an EU country, would you?

nkozyra 3y ago

That's a nice answer but I don't think that prevents you from spending money on arbitration or their getting a default judgement against you.

pas 3y ago
do they even have jurisdiction? have the speakers agreed to arbitration? otherwise it's just more spam. edit: ah, okay, so they signed a "license agreement", which is basically a scam. welp.
- the_mitsuhiko 3y ago
  They likely put a binding arbitration clause into the initial contract for speaking.
  - johngladtj 3y ago
    Why would a contract that is in dispute change the jurisdiction? The point is that the contract is invalid, so it makes no sense that it would be valid for jurisdiction
    - the_mitsuhiko 3y ago
      I responded to this question: > have the speakers agreed to arbitration?

the_mitsuhiko 3y ago

Doesn’t work if they decide to go to arbitration.

cynicalsecurity 3y ago

You must be that lucky person who doesn't live in Poland. An electric administrative court in Poland doesn't even check if the provided evidence is correct in any way. They automatically assume the plaintiff is right, according to the official law. And if you don't object plaintiff's accusations, you lose. They try to contact you by mail, but if they can't, they don't care. It's your fault they couldn't deliver mail to you which looks just like any other scam. The scammer fakes the evidence, submits the case electronically, can request any amount of money and wins by default. Nice, isn't it? You've officially lost in this circus "court". Good luck proving anything to the real court now, as it would consume a lot of your money, time and mental sanity. In the meantime, the scammer is officially allowed to seize any of your money they decided you "owe" them. You would not expect something like this exist in an EU country, would you?