3 ms·
Wait, what? EMJR quoted ChatGPT for a legal opinion on the study? Over a subtle legal question? That's both hilarious and disturbing.
by cratermoon 3y ago
Wait, what? EMJR quoted ChatGPT for a legal opinion on the study? Over a subtle legal question? That's both hilarious and disturbing.
- bagels 3y agoIt's at best parroting a the most common layman beliefs, which may not agree with the law. That stood out to me too. Now I want to read about what dumb thing the site did to even make this possible. Ods should have been random, not hashes of pii
- iudqnolq 3y agoI can see why this would seem to be a clever way to implement passwordless sticky pseudonymous usernames, but it is indeed quite stupid.