3 ms·
Why not?
by breezeTrowel 3y ago
Why not?
- steve1977 3y agoI guess the problem is more that experience is often implicit knowledge and intuition that is hard to teach to others (or even put into words)
- mcpackieh 3y agoYou can teach 20 years of experience but it takes 20 years.
- nine_k 3y agoWhy can't you teach a language to a native proficiency in a year? There's quite a lot to know, and the speed of learning is limited. Answers to advanced questions which you are ready to provide must be met by the actual questions from the student, which must first form in their head as a result of processing the previous servings of knowledge.
- breezeTrowel 3y agoThe corpus of a language is a lot larger and more complex than 20 years of experience in manufacturing especially when a lot of the techniques become dated as new ways of doing things are discovered. Also, we teach thousands of years of experience in mathematics within the scope of 10-20 years. The problem isn't that you can't teach 20 years of experience in a year - you can. The problem is that this knowledge isn't stored anywhere that's easily accessible and that makes propagation next to impossible.