Does that happen because Haskell has significant whitespace? I suppose you might get used to the way it requires you to line things up and come to like it.

Does that happen because Haskell has significant whitespace? I suppose you might get used to the way it requires you to line things up and come to like it. (let ((a b) (c d)) foo) Seems odd to me because the (a b) and (c d) are semantically the same but can't line up. Or, they can't line up without spending a new line on each function call, as if this were Java or something. Don't worry; I know Haskell isn't Java-like. (Haskell is Python plus Perl: Significant whitespace plus polymorphism based on external context of the expression. Written in the APL charset.)