4 ms·
Are there really apps than can distinguish AI vs human? I suspect that at best they can only id a small fraction of what is being written.
by WheelsAtLarge 3y ago
Are there really apps than can distinguish AI vs human? I suspect that at best they can only id a small fraction of what is being written.
- rishikeshs 3y agoZerogpt works fairly well!
- throwawayadvsec 3y agonope, it's crap I got "Your Text contains mixed signals, with some parts generated by AI/GPT" for a Wikipedia article and "Your Text is Likely Human written, may include parts generated by AI/GPT" for a GPT Generated article there is ZERO ways to detect gpt
- wizofaus 3y agoI wonder what % of wikipedia articles do have substantial portions of AI-generated text by now (and is it really a problem, providing the information is accurate - in fact in most cases I can't even imagine caring too much either way if something's written by a bot, but I do care if it's hallucinated BS).
- throwawayadvsec 3y agoit's an old article it's not ai generated
- torsday 3y agoThere are ones that purport to, but none actually do. The false positive rate is crazy high.
- WheelsAtLarge 3y agoIf that's the case then they have little use. We'll be reading AI created text from now on and we won't even know it. I'm not sure how I feel about that.
- muzani 3y agoThis does a very good job with everything from GPT afaik, better than the official one: https://openai-openai-detector--f4d78.hf.space https://openai-openai-detector--f4d78.hf.space But as we have more non-GPT LLMs, we'll probably need more detectors.
- throwawayadvsec 3y agoIt's pretty awful actually.... I sent a one liner prompt to Chat GPT(3.5) to generate an article about some technical topic, sent it to this detector it said 99.98% real... there is no way to detect decent LLMs at the moment