I agree the fields origins are quack and much of ongoing proceedings are quack, but IME many of them have just as deep anatomic knowledge as the PTs and have cr

I agree the fields origins are quack and much of ongoing proceedings are quack, but IME many of them have just as deep anatomic knowledge as the PTs and have cross training in the same studies and theories as PTs. I think the field is trying to legitimize itself and many practitioners are involved in gyms and sports where real results matter and where they rub shoulders with other therapists and doctors picking up the good ideas and “best practices”. All that to say I wish the field would die but the amount of quackery can vary very widely between chiros from little more than a pop factory to essentially the same experience as an average PT.