3 ms·

Thanks for the feedback - This blog could have been better and less aggressively distributed. At the same time, we should consider the credible body of work beh

by gillh 3y ago

Thanks for the feedback - This blog could have been better and less aggressively distributed. At the same time, we should consider the credible body of work behind this. It's not AI-generated spam but backed by actual code that provides a reference implementation behind the idea. See: https://github.com/fluxninja/aperture https://github.com/fluxninja/aperture

ricardobeat 3y ago
It’s a blog post, it will be judged by its content. It does feel like at a minimum it was heavily edited with an AI assistant, verbose and elegant but light on specifics. And if the goal is to get people hooked on how to implement adaptive rate limiting (and maybe adopt fluxninja) it doesn’t seem to be hitting the right note.
- Sudhanshu456 3y ago
  Thanks for the feedback :). I will try to be more specific in next blog.