2 ms·
...why?
by bruce343434 3y ago
...why?
- baggy_trough 3y ago[flagged]
- bruce343434 3y agoYou are enabling quack doctors
- baggy_trough 3y agoYou are killing people under the guise of helping them.
- kortex 3y agoGiving someone Treatment X likely means they won't be pursuing Y, whether it be to avoid polypharmacy drug interactions, or simply because the patient prefers X's side effect profile to Y. Y may be the proven treatment, with worse side effects but better efficacy. Even if the doctors inform the patient "X may not work at all and may make it worse", the patient might still choose it. "What's the harm?" you say. The problem is, without any threshold, there are countless Treatment X. Every single snake oil comes out of the woodwork.
- baggy_trough 3y agoThat's better than interfering with the rights of a patient to decide what to do with their body.
- dang 3y agoCould you please stop posting unsubstantive comments and flamebait? You've unfortunately been doing it repeatedly, and we've already asked you more than once not to. It's not what this site is for, and destroys what it is for. If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be grateful.