3 ms·
I’m fine with that as long as insurance does not pay for any drugs without efficacy testing. Also no advertising of any sort.
by throw9away6 3y ago
I’m fine with that as long as insurance does not pay for any drugs without efficacy testing. Also no advertising of any sort.
- fnord77 3y agoinsurance already gets away with not paying for some highly efficacious drugs, so I don't think this will be a problem
- sterlind 3y agogenerally, insurance companies do require efficacy. many of them have decided not to cover aducanumab for that very reason. though this also gives insurance an additional excuse to deny stratospherically-expensive gene therapies and other life-saving new treatments, since even the most effective new drugs won't have e.g. 10 year survival rates until they're a decade old. agreed on advertising though.