The author does a lot of fence-sitting for very little conclusion. For instance: Your focus should be on responsibly tracking your cashflow versus [

The author does a lot of fence-sitting for very little conclusion. For instance: Your focus should be on responsibly tracking your cashflow versus [A]ll I really only care about is one thing: my bank balance Responsibly tracking cash flow is completely different than knowing your bank balance. One is hard and requires keeping track of income, payments, expenses, etc; the other involves pushing a button at an ATM. Similarly: You...need an accountant. Someone who can do your tax versus what you really need is software TurboTax != a trained accountant. It's also childishly written. "The nasty stuff the tax man needs to see," really? It's almost as bad as Blogger Bob. This reads like (bad) advertising copy for a press release, but it somehow got five points in five minutes. I'd suspect fake accounts, but pg is good about detecting upvote rings.