2 ms·
If these assertions are surprising to readers, it is because the outpourings of Western military punditry have been so dismal: overly credulous of Ukrainian nar
by rainworld 3y ago
If these assertions are surprising to readers, it is because the outpourings of Western military punditry have been so dismal: overly credulous of Ukrainian narratives, locked in a river of thinking that is outmoded, and exceedingly inclined to disparage or ignore obvious aspects of Russian military capability. In war it is perfectly sensible to lie to one’s enemy —indeed it is highly recommended; it is disastrous, though, to lie to oneself which, in fact, has been a main industry of the Western defence establishment for an unfortunately long time. Eventually, though, reality trumps wishful thinking and it is doing so now increasingly obviously on the Russian steppe.
- fatfingerd 3y agoI don't listen to US critics, but the Ukraine has been pretty hedged in their statements. Whether they understood that they needed to get as many resources as possible was independent of whether as pessimistic as possible was the best strategy. I don't really see why the West would be bothered by a long drawn out conflict. I think the other superpowers felt more relaxed when the US was properly tied up in Afghanistan, a defeat and withdrawal makes them much less predictable.