Some info... All of these problems are due to population collapse, due to incredibly low birthrates. Canada is choosing another method, with current targets o

Some info... All of these problems are due to population collapse, due to incredibly low birthrates. Canada is choosing another method, with current targets of 500k/year, and talk of even higher numbers: https://globalnews.ca/news/9836414/canada-immigration-aging-report/ https://globalnews.ca/news/9836414/canada-immigration-aging-... With 40M people, that's more than a 1% per year. And note, those are immigrants, not refugees, or other classes of new Canadians. Just the housing and infrastructure needs alone, and initial support, as well as dealing with validation -> full citizenship is mind bogglng. But beyond that, I believe it is too fast as a culture shift. I want new blood, new ideas, but I also want the ideals of a hoghly democratic nation, its openness to newcomers, its tolerance to not be lost in a voice of newness. EG, I want newcomer input, but I don't want it to drown out what's here. But that's how worrisome the population graph is. There are not enough young people to take care of the old, the old who have worked their entire lives, building what is around us, and paying for tgeir elders to retire, a social contract that is vital. So we know we are doing a risky thing, as all fast change is risky. But we must, or... what? France chose another path. I can't say it is right or wrong. But ... if nothing is done, it won't be good. The stupid part is, everyone is dealing with this. China, Russia, the entire West, we all knew. We all knew the numbers, all of us, decades ago. But we waited. For example, Canada could have ramped up immigration a decade ago, thus softening the social impact.