3 ms·
What driverdan said makes sense. It is much more likely that they obfuscated or masked their code instead of inventing an "unknown" programming language. Even s
by darxius 15y ago
What driverdan said makes sense. It is much more likely that they obfuscated or masked their code instead of inventing an "unknown" programming language. Even so, the obfuscation method used I'm sure would be pretty cunning (seeing as these folk mean business).
It's interesting to see Kaspersky suggest that the state is behind this solely based on some unknown code. Does anyone know why that would be a likely conclusion on their part?
- cag_ii 15y agoFrom what I gathered from the article, this doesn't appear to be obfuscated since the purpose/method is transparent in the decompiled code, it simply doesn't match the constructs you would expect to see in common programming languages when decompiled.