3 ms·
It's quite significant. Life expectancy is about 82 in France. Retiring at 62 vs 64 means: 1. Years of retirement: -2 2. Years of retirement payments: +2 3. Ye
by NoLinkToMe 3y ago
It's quite significant. Life expectancy is about 82 in France. Retiring at 62 vs 64 means:
1. Years of retirement: -2
2. Years of retirement payments: +2
3. Years of retirement fund returns: +2
(3) is significant because at the end the fund will have about 40 years of payments. Suppose an 8% nominal return for two years on average, this means you're getting about 16% on 40 years of savings, or ±6.5 years of savings, on top of 2 years of extra savings by working two extra years, on top of needing 2 years of fewer pay-outs, meaning the 20 year retirement is cut by 8.5 years, or a -42% decrease.
Not to mention side benefits. (ample evidence that working and staying active longer, reduces healthcare costs on society, for example).
I'm simplifying the calculations quite a bit of course, but this actually has a massive impact.
- pyrale 3y ago> Years of retirement fund returns: +2 There is no significant retirement fund in France's main pension scheme.
- DropInIn 3y agoWhen getting the life expectancy numbers did you exclude all deaths from before "working age"? Because a significant effect is imparted by childhood deaths to the average life expectancy, especially for men, and those individuals never contribute to any pension fund nor taxes. That has a massive impact on the results of the calculations.