This link is posted in bad faith -- in the doc's current state (https://archive.is/wJRDG#privacy https://archive.is/wJRDG#privacy), directly linking to the (emp

This link is posted in bad faith -- in the doc's current state (https://archive.is/wJRDG#privacy https://archive.is/wJRDG#privacy), directly linking to the (empty) privacy section implies that the authors did not consider privacy at all. But clearly that's not true, given that the authors wrote ~500 words in their high level overview about how they would try to mitigate fingerprinting and cross site tracking: https://github.com/RupertBenWiser/Web-Environment-Integrity/blob/main/explainer.md#challenges-and-threats-to-address https://github.com/RupertBenWiser/Web-Environment-Integrity/.... It's obvious that this doc is just a very early working draft -- the rest of the spec is filled with TODOs as well, including TODOs for basic definitions. Yes, you might disagree with the proposal, but it's better to argue against the proposal constructively instead of bad faith misrepresentations.