There are no actual footnote marks that connect any statements in the post to the footnotes, so there are no specific claims referenced. But if you read the ac

There are no actual footnote marks that connect any statements in the post to the footnotes, so there are no specific claims referenced. But if you read the actual text of the page, they say it compares favorably to 3.5 for some tasks. Which means it falls short of 3.5 for the rest and GPT-4 for all of them, or else they surely would have mentioned that as well.