3 ms·

So Free, as in 4 random letters that were strung together.

• version_five 3y ago
  GratisWilly?
• jojobas 3y ago
  CC-BY-NC 4.0 is pretty free?
  • victor9000 3y ago
    A more thoughtful discussion on the subject: https://opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/1717/why-is-cc-by-sa-discouraged-for-code https://opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/1717/why-is-c...
    • IanCal 3y ago
      It's not code, that's also a discussion about a license not used here.
  • avereveard 3y ago
    -NC is the pretty restrictive part.
  • IanCal 3y ago
    It is. I think people are perhaps leaping to the usual discussions when models are called "open source" but here it seems they've called it free. Wasn't the whole foundational part of the open source discussion about distinguishing open and free? Edit - someone will no doubt bring up "open access" as a term. This is a common term for academic work and the license here easily meets the criteria usually applied. Open access is not the same as open source.