2 ms·
There's a lot of non-Chomskian linguistics out there. Basically if you look for "linguistic typology" there's a probably at least 90% chance that Chomsky will b
by Tainnor 3y ago
There's a lot of non-Chomskian linguistics out there. Basically if you look for "linguistic typology" there's a probably at least 90% chance that Chomsky will be totally irrelevant.
(Some of my favourites in that area used to be Martin Haspelmath, Balthasar Bickel, Gilbert Lazard, ... - but I haven't kept myself up to date with the literature for years now)