> making it easier to make more visceral and convincing versions of that won't have any bad effects? This is not an argument that I see people making. They're

> making it easier to make more visceral and convincing versions of that won't have any bad effects? This is not an argument that I see people making. They're saying that sending deepfakes to your job is just plain harassment, and that the photograph, which is only thought of as evidence because it is difficult to fake, will have lost its value as evidence. The invention of photography didn't make it easier to fake narratives, it made it harder.