4 ms·
Surely AGI would also replace the owners because it would also be better at owning the means of production? There’s basically two routes then, in science ficti
by masklinn 3y ago
Surely AGI would also replace the owners because it would also be better at owning the means of production?
There’s basically two routes then, in science fiction: the AI decides humans are wasteful (men of iron / thinking machines), or the AI goes turbo-communism because it sees humans as pets and you take care of and provide for your pets.
- worrycue 3y agoPerhaps I'm wrong but all intelligences are basically goal seeking machines no? People who create/own the AGI will program them with goals compatible to their own: AI's only goal is to of service to the owner and be an extension of the owner's will. Thus the AI will never overthrow them. AI will run their empires for their owners while said owners sit back and enjoy their lives.
- blibble 3y agoonly if they can program perfectly what do you think the odds of that are?
- worrycue 3y agoIf it's reliable enough to take over professional work, it can take over executive work as well.
- masklinn 3y agoThat assumes anyone understands the agi, especially after having put the agi through a few rounds of self improvement. But afaik we already can’t explain the specific behaviour of LLM, only their general B-road strokes.
- erewr4335543 3y ago"all intelligences are basically goal seeking machines no?" No, not really. They can just exist along you, think Da vinci or Einstein. They don't really tried to change their worlds, even having that capability. So humans could be just living along "a giant", or several of them, at any historical moment, even right now. And not really be aware of them at all. Artificial or not.