3 ms·
Less "bloat" doesn't mean more performance. C++ libraries have soundly beaten their C counterparts in HPC, HFT, ML, etc. And in any case it is still possible to
by SubjectToChange 3y ago
Less "bloat" doesn't mean more performance. C++ libraries have soundly beaten their C counterparts in HPC, HFT, ML, etc. And in any case it is still possible to write a C-dialect in C++ if you so choose.
- pipeline_peak 3y agoI was referring to bloat as in memory usage. A quick glance at Moe, I see inheritance in something as fundamental as buffers.
- SubjectToChange 3y agoAgain, you can write a C89 (even more with C++20) dialect in C++. There’s practically nothing C can do that C++ can’t. Also, the fact that the linked page recommends tinycc and pcc pretty much proves they don’t care about performance or memory usage.