The license has a bunch of terms and restrictions that make it incompatible with accepted definitions of open source software. LLaMA2 isn't "Open Source" - and

The license has a bunch of terms and restrictions that make it incompatible with accepted definitions of open source software. LLaMA2 isn't "Open Source" - and why it doesn't matter https://www.alessiofanelli.com/blog/llama2-isnt-open-source https://www.alessiofanelli.com/blog/llama2-isnt-open-source Meta can call Llama open source as much as it likes, but that doesn't mean it is https://www.theregister.com/2023/07/21/llama_is_not_open_source/ https://www.theregister.com/2023/07/21/llama_is_not_open_sou... Software licenses masquerading as open source (I wrote that one) http://marble.onl/posts/software-licenses-masquerading-as-open-source.html http://marble.onl/posts/software-licenses-masquerading-as-op... There have been lots of other posts on here about this too.