2 ms·
Its license is quite obviously not matching the definition of Open Source: > v. You will not use the Llama Materials or any output or results of the Llama Mate
by seba_dos1 3y ago
Its license is quite obviously not matching the definition of Open Source:
> v. You will not use the Llama Materials or any output or results of the Llama Materials to improve any other large language model (excluding Llama 2 or derivative works thereof).
> 2. Additional Commercial Terms. If, on the Llama 2 version release date, the monthly active users of the products or services made available by or for Licensee, or Licensee’s affiliates, is greater than 700 million monthly active users in the preceding calendar month, you must request a license from Meta, which Meta may grant to you in its sole discretion, and you are not authorized to exercise any of the rights under this Agreement unless or until Meta otherwise expressly grants you such rights.
> Prohibited Uses: <a whole page full of text>