These are good points to bring up. > This could wind up with some strange situations where someone generating output with the intent of using it for training c

These are good points to bring up. > This could wind up with some strange situations where someone generating output with the intent of using it for training could be prosecuted (or at least forced to cease and desist) but anyone actually using that output for training would be in the clear. I'll add to this that it's not just output; say that someone is using another service built on top of LLaMA. Facebook itself launched LLaMA 2.0 with a public-facing playground that doesn't require any license agreement or login to use. You can go right now and use their public-facing portal and generate as much training data as you can before they IP-block you, and... as far as I can tell you haven't done anything in that scenario that I can see that would bind you to this license agreement. So I still feel like I'll be surprised if any AI company that's serious about wanting bootstrapping itself off of LLaMA is going to be too concerned about this license (whether that's a good idea to do just because the training data itself might be garbage is another conversation). It just seems so easy to get around any restrictions.