> Sorry, but if it's doesn't have abstraction it's not readable. This is why i very carefully wrote "legible" instead of "readable". > You get smothered in de

> Sorry, but if it's doesn't have abstraction it's not readable. This is why i very carefully wrote "legible" instead of "readable". > You get smothered in details. No forest, just trees. People will just create a framework that generates the file like Sass does with CSS. That ... is exactly what i was suggesting?!