3 ms·
- Consistent output, less variability due to seasonal concerns like drought. Also output is constant year round. Less concerns about financial instruments (futu
by orbz 3y ago
- Consistent output, less variability due to seasonal concerns like drought. Also output is constant year round. Less concerns about financial instruments (futures) to manage risk.
- More water efficiency which is becoming more of a concern with changing climes.
- Less need for fertilizer and pesticides, resulting in less potential toxicity for consumers.
- Precise control over growth conditions allows for perfection of individual crops when it comes to taste and nutrient density.
- Less biodiversity impact of traditional land based farming, more forest area available land.
- Transport is still a huge environmental impact, especially when it has to be transported internationally.
Edit: Also less concern of agriculture contamination, e.g. cattle farm upriver causing bacterial infection like salmonella.
- wil421 3y agoHow’s any of that better than Hot House style tomatoes I can buy year around? Why farm in expensive areas that require vertical farms when land is everywhere in the US.
- RosanaAnaDana 3y agoHead lettuce might make sense since it needs a lot of packaging and refrigeratoration to get to market. I can imagine a vertical system where it's grown in its clamshell, not dissimilar to some head lettuce you find at the store. It's gotta be in a refrigeratorated truck or car for the journey. It's also in pretty high and constant demand. For pretty much everything else though...
- smogcutter 3y agoYou’re missing the point. To the extent these things are true (unclear why an artificial environment would have less need for fertilizer), they’re true about ordinary greenhouses. So what does verticality add other than complication, and why is it so valuable for “dense urban areas”? Do any of the gains you propose make up for the enormous loss of free energy from the Sun? So far, in real life, the answer is a resounding no.