4 ms·
No, they're not asking ""please don't cover this story"". They are "strongly cautioning" them not to, which can reasonably be interpreted as a veiled threat.
by burgerbrain 15y ago
No, they're not asking ""please don't cover this story"". They are "strongly cautioning" them not to, which can reasonably be interpreted as a veiled threat.
- jrockway 15y agoA threat to do what?
- burgerbrain 15y ago"I know where you live." What is that a threat to do? How about, "Be careful."?
- jrockway 15y agoThe government's powers are limited by the Constitution. Someone who threatens to follow you home and kill you, however, is operating in an environment without restrictions, and you might therefore worry that you're actually going to be killed. "Prior restraint" is a well-tested concept and it doesn't do very well in court. And all the government has to harass you are the courts.
- burgerbrain 15y agoJust because you think that the only way the government is capable of harassing you is with the courts, does not mean that they are not capable of veiled threats. A threats are not limited to personal physical violence. Though I of course strongly disagree with your premise anyway, particularly when the governmental agency in question is the DHS.