3 ms·

Thoughts are not crimes in free countries. What someone "might" do is irrelevant.

• circuit10 3y ago
  Amazon thought that the person had already shouted a slur at the driver. They were wrong, but if they had been right blocking further deliveries to protect the drivers would have been reasonable (if it was just that)
  • Auracle 3y ago
    I disagree. It should take something like a police report to block further deliveries. Just taking one delivery driver’s word is ripe for abuse.
    • circuit10 3y ago
      So Amazon should continue sending people to someone who will racially abuse them just because the police didn’t catch it yet? (again, assuming that they had done the investigation properly which they didn’t in this case, which would involve collecting more evidence to back it up)
      • Auracle 3y ago
        I said a police report, meaning the driver would report it to the police. Not that they'd catch them in the act.