4 ms·
That sounds roughly like the same ratios for most digital art on the internet. It's also probably indicative of the types of people (kind of nerdy, probably) pe
by lghh 3y ago
That sounds roughly like the same ratios for most digital art on the internet. It's also probably indicative of the types of people (kind of nerdy, probably) people who are making images with Midjourney. I'm more likely to use Midjourney to make an image than a trained artist is, but a trained artist's image will likely be higher quality, more creative, and more diverse from what we're seeing here. Clearly, I'm guessing a little bit, but I bet that's what's happening.
- zirgs 3y agoMidjourney is a gateway drug to more advanced image generators.
- lghh 3y agoWhich generators are you referring to?
- krapp 3y agoStable Diffusion, likely.
- jazzyjackson 3y agoSomeone else mentioned civitai.com, I gave it a look and was surprised at the diversity of models, most of which are derived from stable diffusion tho.
- krapp 3y agoI don't know. Here's someone making vintage movie posters with Midjourney[0]. Most professional artists would kill to be able to produce work like this. Also another account[1]. I don't see lack of quality and creativity here. Other than maybe the bland face syndrome which (apart from weird hands) seems to be a problem with AI. Granted, one could say that what quality and creativity there is belongs to other artists (notwithstanding touch-up work in photoshop, etc) but it's still clearly there. We're way past the point where AI art is qualitatively substandard relative to professional art, it's just subject to Sturgeon's Law, where most of it is low effort. [0]https://www.instagram.com/todd_skull/ https://www.instagram.com/todd_skull/ [1]https://www.instagram.com/drawiaj/ https://www.instagram.com/drawiaj/