>That stuff is very speculative. But we don't need AI to get to that level for it to be very dangerous. Just imagine that we have an open source GPT that is som

>That stuff is very speculative. But we don't need AI to get to that level for it to be very dangerous. Just imagine that we have an open source GPT that is something like 33% smarter than GPT-4 and less brittle. Make the output 50 times faster than human thought and suppose that we can run it very inexpensively, in a "swarm" of agents cooperating. Then you have a type of superintelligence No. Then you have something that can spout plausible sounding nonsense mixed in with facts gleaned from crawling the internet. There are some dangers to this - don't get me wrong. It could be used to create bots which engage in much more sophisticated social media manipulation on a large scale, for instance.