3 ms·
To clarify what I was trying to argue for, if one is using the .net async Task system only for the purpose to help the thread pool (always immediately awaiting
by ikekkdcjkfke 3y ago
To clarify what I was trying to argue for, if one is using the .net async Task system only for the purpose to help the thread pool (always immediately awaiting an async method) then the responsibility should bear more on the .net framework, instead of spilling async/await Task<> into code bases. I don't know what a solution looks like, but maybe just threads are too expensive in .net