I don't quite understand the nature of the study. I recognize the concept of "noncommitment", it's definitely how my visualization (and more generally, my "conf

I don't quite understand the nature of the study. I recognize the concept of "noncommitment", it's definitely how my visualization (and more generally, my "confabulatory" capability) operates. But as soon as you start asking me questions about it, you're biasing me toward making sure I come up with extra physical details that I think might be salient based on past questions. I don't normally visualize a scene in extreme detail because it's not necessary. So what is the study testing exactly? How much detail they created without any clue/context into what kinds of questions they would later be asked? Or the actual limit/extent of people's visualization capabilities?