> there’s no agreement on what “evil” means whatsoever Indeed, which is why lawyers won’t want to take the risk. I’m sure they wouldn’t want to use software w

> there’s no agreement on what “evil” means whatsoever Indeed, which is why lawyers won’t want to take the risk. I’m sure they wouldn’t want to use software whose license claims you can’t “hooblepop shanglefronks” either, for that matter, without discussing with the owner to clarify what that means. Essentially the practical meaning of this license is “this can’t be used by companies with careful lawyers who take license terms seriously”, which I doubt was the intent.