3 ms·
> If that's the definition of "on board", we really don't have any useful information on if citizens (or residents) are on board or not. Well, there's the subm
by lapcat 3y ago
> If that's the definition of "on board", we really don't have any useful information on if citizens (or residents) are on board or not.
Well, there's the submitted link: "In 1961 a Gallup poll showed only 33% of Americans in favor of moon landing" ;-)
- toast0 3y agoa) I don't think a Gallup poll is useful information :P b) I thought we were talking about being onboard in landslide elections, as you quoted so many messages ago.
- lapcat 3y ago> a) I don't think a Gallup poll is useful information :P I'm not sure why you're here commenting on the Gallup poll article then, or how you think we would ever have useful information about the public? b) I thought we were talking about being onboard in landslide elections, as you quoted so many messages ago. Again, the context is the submitted link. I can't speak for the OP, but I'm guessing the idea was that a landslide election is supposed to give the winner a "mandate" for their agenda.