4 ms·
>well The writing wasn’t very good anyway, it was all a regurgitation of the same thing over and over anyways well, yes. you clearly understand the problem, b
by notatoad 3y ago
>well The writing wasn’t very good anyway, it was all a regurgitation of the same thing over and over anyways
well, yes. you clearly understand the problem, but stating it dismissively doesn't refute it.
paying people to do minimal rewrites of press releases or wire service articles is not productive work. at all. people would be better served by reading the original source.
a job that requires no skill and provides no benefit isn't really a job, it's just a selectively-applied welfare program, disproportionately provided to the people with the best connections. putting a stop to those sorts of "jobs" is not a bad thing.
- JimtheCoder 3y ago" it's just a selectively-applied welfare program, disproportionately provided to the people with the best connections. putting a stop to those sorts of "jobs" is not a bad thing." As long as you have somewhere else to put them...or else they will go on another type of welfare program where they don't have to do any work. That is the issue here...