Just because it's true doesn't fireproof their pants. They already operate a service that is not free to build operate, and we know beyond a shadow of a doubt

Just because it's true doesn't fireproof their pants. They already operate a service that is not free to build operate, and we know beyond a shadow of a doubt costs taxpayers needless additional billions of dollars. So then why would the taxpayers not want to invest an alternative that could spend "needless billions" to save additional needless billions?