4 ms·
My point was that minimizing the csam issue isn't that relevant to the terribleness of a proposed law. Csam will likely always exist, unfortunately. It's too ha
by hellojesus 3y ago
My point was that minimizing the csam issue isn't that relevant to the terribleness of a proposed law. Csam will likely always exist, unfortunately. It's too hard to prevent; the punishments seem to be nondeterrents.
We already have mountains of awful laws that are passed via appeal to csam emotion. I see no reason to pass another one under the appeal of csam reduction when we all know how it will really be used.
- anigbrowl 3y agoAgain, I'm not arguing in favor of this law, quite the opposite. I don't require you to persuade me of an opinion I already hold.