> I came to the conclusion that WEBP was consistently better than JPEG This surprises me greatly if you're talking about image quality. I've always found WebP

> I came to the conclusion that WEBP was consistently better than JPEG This surprises me greatly if you're talking about image quality. I've always found WebP to be consistently worse than JPEG in quality. I only use WebP for lossless images, because at least then being smaller than PNG is an advantage.